HOME          OUR MISSION          MEDIA          BLOG          LINKS          CONTACT

Archive for October, 2009

City of Yakima EMS Levy Results and Fire Fighter / Paramedics Proposal

Monday, October 5th, 2009
To: Mayor Dave Edler
Councilmember Maureen Adkison
Councilmember Micah Cawley
Councilmember Kathy Coffey
Councilmember Rick Ensey
Councilmember Bill Lover
Councilmember Sonia Rodriguez
Subject: City of Yakima EMS Levy Results and Fire Fighter / Paramedics Proposal
We thank.you for Yakima Fire Chief Hines letter response dated May 5, 2009 which addressed some of our questions to you in our recent correspondence but left many questions unanswered. SOAR remains steadfastly opposed to expanding Yakima Fire Department services at this time to include paramedics on fire engines. Please be reminded once again of the February 3, 2009 EMS levy proposal which failed by a substantial margin with over 59% NO votes.
Even though Chief Hines continues to seek City Council approval to “just” allow the Yakima Fire Department to utilize the paramedic services of two current fire fighters, Chief Hines May 5, 2009 letter to SOAR clearly states his goal is “to place a Firefighter/Paramedic on every neighborhood fire engine.” What is the start up cost and ongoing cost for his clearly stated goal?? Can the City of Yakima afford this goal ?? Please refer to our previous correspondence in which we stated our strong belief that Chief Hines proposal with the two current fire fighters is
just the “nose of the camel in the tent.”
We believe that our City currently has an EMS system that works with private ambulance services and a user pay system. Our City cannot afford to be and do everything for everybody. We must use our limited resources in the most cost effective manner. During times that the City is discussing closing parks and pools due to shortage of resources, it appears unwise to be considering expanding fire department services.
Chief Hines included his August 4,2008 letter to Bob Hall in his response to our concerns. It is interesting to note that year 1987 to 2007 statistics are used by Chief Hines to show that fire calls of an emergency medical nature increased by over 400% during this time period. These same statistics can show an almost 20% decrease in non-medical emergency calls ( we presume fire related calls) during this same time period as shown below:
1987 – 3,189 responses X 0.48 = 1531 / 49.6K= 31 calls per 1000 population
2007 – 9,009 responses X 0.24 = 2160 / 85.0K = 25 calls per 1000 population
We encourage the City Council to look very carefully at all the statistics being presented to you as very different messages can be delivered from the same raw data.
SOAR continues to respect our Yakima Fire Fighters and the job they are paid to perfonn. We believe the City Council should direct the Yakima Fire Department to focus on vital fire fighting services and let the private ambulance services do their job.
Very truly yours,
M.A. (Mel) Tanasse
Save Our American Rights ( SOAR )

To: Mayor Dave Edler

Councilmember Maureen Adkison

Councilmember Micah Cawley

Councilmember Kathy Coffey

Councilmember Rick Ensey

Councilmember Bill Lover

Councilmember Sonia Rodriguez

Subject: City of Yakima EMS Levy Results and Fire Fighter / Paramedics Proposal

June 1, 2009

We thank.you for Yakima Fire Chief Hines letter response dated May 5, 2009 which addressed some of our questions to you in our recent correspondence but left many questions unanswered. SOAR remains steadfastly opposed to expanding Yakima Fire Department services at this time to include paramedics on fire engines. Please be reminded once again of the February 3, 2009 EMS levy proposal which failed by a substantial margin with over 59% NO votes.

Even though Chief Hines continues to seek City Council approval to “just” allow the Yakima Fire Department to utilize the paramedic services of two current fire fighters, Chief Hines May 5, 2009 letter to SOAR clearly states his goal is “to place a Firefighter/Paramedic on every neighborhood fire engine.” What is the start up cost and ongoing cost for his clearly stated goal?? Can the City of Yakima afford this goal ?? Please refer to our previous correspondence in which we stated our strong belief that Chief Hines proposal with the two current fire fighters is

just the “nose of the camel in the tent.”

We believe that our City currently has an EMS system that works with private ambulance services and a user pay system. Our City cannot afford to be and do everything for everybody. We must use our limited resources in the most cost effective manner. During times that the City is discussing closing parks and pools due to shortage of resources, it appears unwise to be considering expanding fire department services.

Chief Hines included his August 4,2008 letter to Bob Hall in his response to our concerns. It is interesting to note that year 1987 to 2007 statistics are used by Chief Hines to show that fire calls of an emergency medical nature increased by over 400% during this time period. These same statistics can show an almost 20% decrease in non-medical emergency calls ( we presume fire related calls) during this same time period as shown below:

1987 – 3,189 responses X 0.48 = 1531 / 49.6K= 31 calls per 1000 population

2007 – 9,009 responses X 0.24 = 2160 / 85.0K = 25 calls per 1000 population

We encourage the City Council to look very carefully at all the statistics being presented to you as very different messages can be delivered from the same raw data.

SOAR continues to respect our Yakima Fire Fighters and the job they are paid to perfonn. We believe the City Council should direct the Yakima Fire Department to focus on vital fire fighting services and let the private ambulance services do their job.

Very truly yours,

M.A. (Mel) Tanasse

Save Our American Rights ( SOAR )

Letter from Fire Chief Charlie Hines RE: EMS Levy

Monday, October 5th, 2009
May 5,2009
M.A. (Mel) Tanasse
Save Our American Rights (SOAR)
PO Box 1288
Yakima, WA 98907
Mr. Tanasse,
I received your letter dated April 29, 2009. The City Manager has directed me to respond to your inquiries. I understand that you are confused or unsure as to the reasons for allowing our two Firefighter/Paramedics to be allowed to utilize their life-saving skills on emergency responses. Because most of these have been addressed in previous public presentations throughout the city and in the media as well, over the past year and a half, I will be succinct in my answers. However if you would like further clarification on any matter, even if you would like to meet and discuss them, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Some of the questions were redundant and I took the liberty of combining them.
1. Where is the citizens group or committee that would be advocating that paramedics be added to fire truck?
The Yakima County EMS/Trauma Council, The South Central Washington EMS/Trauma Council and the Governor’s sub-committee on EMS at the State Department of Health all saw the need and approved a “non-transport” (Aid-Car/Engine co.) Paramedic program in the city of Yakima. These committees consist of physicians, nurses, ambulance operators, fire service professionals, elected officials and citizens. In addition, local Doctors and citizens have stated their support through the media and correspondence to the council and the YFD.
2. Why is the Fire Department pushing for paramedics on fire trucks?
Yakima fire stations are strategically located throughout the city to deliver time critical and effective patient care rapidly. They are staffed 24/7 with professional Firefighters who are trained in emergency medical care. Often times they arrive at your medical emergency before the ambulance and start treating the patient. Unfortunately, they are limited to administering only basic life support (unable to administer IV’s, medication or advanced airways). In addition, it is our goal to get a Paramedic to the patient faster. The only way to accomplish this is to place a Firefighter/Paramedic on every neighborhood fire engine. When teamed up with a private ambulance Paramedic, they provide better, faster, more efficient patient care.
3. Why does the fire department want to compete with private ambulance services?
The YFD is not competing with the private ambulance companies. We are looking to strengthen a public/private partnership in which the public benefits. If we were to place a FD ambulance in business, that would be deemed as competition. Chief Hines has NEVER considered this proposal. Actually, quite the opposite. Two years ago he shared his vision (of Paramedic Engine co’s) with the two private ambulance companies. American Medical Response (AMR) has endorsed this concept. They stated they have successfully worked in this type of EMS system for many years all across the country. It has proven to provide better patient care while concurrently strengthening their ambulance company. This is a multi-million dollar company that is professionally run and is traded on the stock market. They would NEVER endorse a program that would endanger their “bottom line”. We want private ambulances to continue responding with us on medical emergencies. The YFD doesn’t have enough Firefighters to staff our fire engines, let alone ambulances. We estimate that it would cost the city over 2-million dollars to implement a fire department ambulance service. There is NO WAY the citizens, the council, city management or the Firefighters would ever approve this. In addition, Fire Department ambulance programs in Pasco and Walla Walla are in the “Red” (losing money). To continue to suggest that there is a YFD conspiracy to get into the ambulance business is nothing short of ludicrous.
4. Is the Fire Union trying to expand and increase firefighter salaries as paramedics while cloaking their proposal under the banner of public safety?
Absolutely not. Yakima Firefighters have a passion to serve their fellow human beings on the worst day of their life. They take pride in their role as public servants. Yakima Firefighters have been placing themselves in harms way for complete strangers for over 100 years. To suggest this is an insult to every Firefighter.
5. Were the two existing firefighters hired as firemen or as paramedics?
Both were hired as Firefighters.
6. Do they receive additional compensation because of their advanced training which is not currently required for their jobs?
No.
7. Why would we want to change to a publicly funded system?
The proposed improvements would be funded through current EMS Levy funds. It is impossible to increase the amount without City Council approval.
8. Our city currently has an EMS system that works, why would we want to change?
There is tremendous room for improvement in our current pre-hospital care system, which would result in better patient care. See attachments.
9. Why does the City Fire Department respond with large, expensive fire trucks to all 911 EMS calls?
The fire engine is equipped to mitigate nearly any type of emergency (fires, ice/water rescue, auto extrication/jaws of life, hazmat, trench cave-in, hi-angle rescue and medical calls). Often, the fire engine will respond to several types of calls before returning to the fire station. If the Firefighters responded to a medical emergency in a pickup truck, cleared the call and were then dispatched to any other type of emergency, they would have to drive back to the fire station and jump into the engine co. and then respond. As you can see, this would drastically increase our response time.
10.Why can’t the EMS dispatchers use discretion as to when large, expensive fire trucks are necessary?
“Priority Dispatching” or “Tiered Response’ has been one of my goals since becoming Fire Chief. Unfortunately, you can’t just “flip a switch” and make it happen. It must be presented and approved by every fire agency and dispatch center in Yakima County. We are currently beginning discussions with the county fire chiefs association, the Yakima County EMS Ops board and the Yakima Communications Center. In addition the current city “ambulance ordinance” must be modified to accomplish this.
11.Is the City Fire Department responding to all 911 calls for EMS to simply increase their “call volume” to increase statistics and revenue from the Countywide EMS levy funds?
No. As discussed in the previous question, our calls for service have already exceeded our resources’. We are in favor of implementing a Tiered response system.
12. Would training additional firefighters as paramedics leave us with fewer firefighters on duty or much increase overtime or additional cost for temporary firefighters to fill these positions while others are being trained as paramedics?
It is impossible for the YFD to send any Firefighters to Paramedic school. We do not have the resources’ or money to “back-fill” the position left vacant for the 11 month school.
13.What would be the pay increase for firefighters who are trained as paramedics?
That would be negotiated. It would be no different than other Firefighters who currently receive skill pay for Hazmat Team, Arson Investigator, Technical Rescue Team etc.
14. What will be the future budget impacts of this program to add paramedics on fire trucks?
It must remain within the YFD budget unless the Public Safety Committee, City Manager and City Council approve an increase.
15. Perhaps the Yakima City Council should direct the firefighter’s duties, when not responding to fire calls, to improving the City’s safety and fire rating by being involved more with code enforcement, weedy lots, trashed up properties, derelict buildings, etc.?
Currently the Yakima Fire Department’s “Washington Survey and Rating Bureau” (WSRB) grade is a “4″. It used to be a “3″. The only way to improve it (bring it back to a “3″) is to increase operational staffing. This grade has a direct impact on the amount citizens (especially business owners) pay on their insurance premiums.
16. “The City Council should direct the Yakima Fire Department to focus on the vital fire fighting services and let the private ambulance services do their jobs”.
The reality today is that the fire service has become the first line medical responder for critical illness and injury in virtually every community in America. Regardless of what agency provides medical transportation services, the fire service is the agency that first delivers on-scene health care services under most true emergency conditions. I’m sure you recall the recent media coverage of Yakima Firefighters arriving on scene and delivering two babies, PRIOR to the private ambulance arrival. In addition, the private ambulances routinely depend on Yakima Firefighters to perform patient care in the back of their ambulances-while en route to the hospital. This is yet another example of a public/private partnership where the tax payer benefits.
Take Care,
Charlie Hines
Fire Chief
cc: Dick Zais
Dave Zabell
Mayor Dave Edler
Council Members:
Maureen Adkinson
Micah Cawley
Kathy Coffey
Rick Ensey
Bill Lover
Sonia Rodriguez
May 5,2009
M.A. (Mel) Tanasse
Save Our American Rights (SOAR)
PO Box 1288
Yakima, WA 98907
Mr. Tanasse,
I received your letter dated April 29, 2009. The City Manager has directed me to respond to your inquiries. I understand that you are confused or unsure as to the reasons for allowing our two Firefighter/Paramedics to be allowed to utilize their life-saving skills on emergency responses. Because most of these have been addressed in previous public presentations throughout the city and in the media as well, over the past year and a half, I will be succinct in my answers. However if you would like further clarification on any matter, even if you would like to meet and discuss them, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Some of the questions were redundant and I took the liberty of combining them.
1. Where is the citizens group or committee that would be advocating that paramedics be added to fire truck?
The Yakima County EMS/Trauma Council, The South Central Washington EMS/Trauma Council and the Governor’s sub-committee on EMS at the State Department of Health all saw the need and approved a “non-transport” (Aid-Car/Engine co.) Paramedic program in the city of Yakima. These committees consist of physicians, nurses, ambulance operators, fire service professionals, elected officials and citizens. In addition, local Doctors and citizens have stated their support through the media and correspondence to the council and the YFD.
2. Why is the Fire Department pushing for paramedics on fire trucks?
Yakima fire stations are strategically located throughout the city to deliver time critical and effective patient care rapidly. They are staffed 24/7 with professional Firefighters who are trained in emergency medical care. Often times they arrive at your medical emergency before the ambulance and start treating the patient. Unfortunately, they are limited to administering only basic life support (unable to administer IV’s, medication or advanced airways). In addition, it is our goal to get a Paramedic to the patient faster. The only way to accomplish this is to place a Firefighter/Paramedic on every neighborhood fire engine. When teamed up with a private ambulance Paramedic, they provide better, faster, more efficient patient care.
3. Why does the fire department want to compete with private ambulance services?
The YFD is not competing with the private ambulance companies. We are looking to strengthen a public/private partnership in which the public benefits. If we were to place a FD ambulance in business, that would be deemed as competition. Chief Hines has NEVER considered this proposal. Actually, quite the opposite. Two years ago he shared his vision (of Paramedic Engine co’s) with the two private ambulance companies. American Medical Response (AMR) has endorsed this concept. They stated they have successfully worked in this type of EMS system for many years all across the country. It has proven to provide better patient care while concurrently strengthening their ambulance company. This is a multi-million dollar company that is professionally run and is traded on the stock market. They would NEVER endorse a program that would endanger their “bottom line”. We want private ambulances to continue responding with us on medical emergencies. The YFD doesn’t have enough Firefighters to staff our fire engines, let alone ambulances. We estimate that it would cost the city over 2-million dollars to implement a fire department ambulance service. There is NO WAY the citizens, the council, city management or the Firefighters would ever approve this. In addition, Fire Department ambulance programs in Pasco and Walla Walla are in the “Red” (losing money). To continue to suggest that there is a YFD conspiracy to get into the ambulance business is nothing short of ludicrous.
4. Is the Fire Union trying to expand and increase firefighter salaries as paramedics while cloaking their proposal under the banner of public safety?
Absolutely not. Yakima Firefighters have a passion to serve their fellow human beings on the worst day of their life. They take pride in their role as public servants. Yakima Firefighters have been placing themselves in harms way for complete strangers for over 100 years. To suggest this is an insult to every Firefighter.
5. Were the two existing firefighters hired as firemen or as paramedics?
Both were hired as Firefighters.
6. Do they receive additional compensation because of their advanced training which is not currently required for their jobs?
No.
7. Why would we want to change to a publicly funded system?
The proposed improvements would be funded through current EMS Levy funds. It is impossible to increase the amount without City Council approval.
8. Our city currently has an EMS system that works, why would we want to change?
There is tremendous room for improvement in our current pre-hospital care system, which would result in better patient care. See attachments.
9. Why does the City Fire Department respond with large, expensive fire trucks to all 911 EMS calls?
The fire engine is equipped to mitigate nearly any type of emergency (fires, ice/water rescue, auto extrication/jaws of life, hazmat, trench cave-in, hi-angle rescue and medical calls). Often, the fire engine will respond to several types of calls before returning to the fire station. If the Firefighters responded to a medical emergency in a pickup truck, cleared the call and were then dispatched to any other type of emergency, they would have to drive back to the fire station and jump into the engine co. and then respond. As you can see, this would drastically increase our response time.
10.Why can’t the EMS dispatchers use discretion as to when large, expensive fire trucks are necessary?
“Priority Dispatching” or “Tiered Response’ has been one of my goals since becoming Fire Chief. Unfortunately, you can’t just “flip a switch” and make it happen. It must be presented and approved by every fire agency and dispatch center in Yakima County. We are currently beginning discussions with the county fire chiefs association, the Yakima County EMS Ops board and the Yakima Communications Center. In addition the current city “ambulance ordinance” must be modified to accomplish this.
11.Is the City Fire Department responding to all 911 calls for EMS to simply increase their “call volume” to increase statistics and revenue from the Countywide EMS levy funds?
No. As discussed in the previous question, our calls for service have already exceeded our resources’. We are in favor of implementing a Tiered response system.
12. Would training additional firefighters as paramedics leave us with fewer firefighters on duty or much increase overtime or additional cost for temporary firefighters to fill these positions while others are being trained as paramedics?
It is impossible for the YFD to send any Firefighters to Paramedic school. We do not have the resources’ or money to “back-fill” the position left vacant for the 11 month school.
13.What would be the pay increase for firefighters who are trained as paramedics?
That would be negotiated. It would be no different than other Firefighters who currently receive skill pay for Hazmat Team, Arson Investigator, Technical Rescue Team etc.
14. What will be the future budget impacts of this program to add paramedics on fire trucks?
It must remain within the YFD budget unless the Public Safety Committee, City Manager and City Council approve an increase.
15. Perhaps the Yakima City Council should direct the firefighter’s duties, when not responding to fire calls, to improving the City’s safety and fire rating by being involved more with code enforcement, weedy lots, trashed up properties, derelict buildings, etc.?
Currently the Yakima Fire Department’s “Washington Survey and Rating Bureau” (WSRB) grade is a “4″. It used to be a “3″. The only way to improve it (bring it back to a “3″) is to increase operational staffing. This grade has a direct impact on the amount citizens (especially business owners) pay on their insurance premiums.
16. “The City Council should direct the Yakima Fire Department to focus on the vital fire fighting services and let the private ambulance services do their jobs”.
The reality today is that the fire service has become the first line medical responder for critical illness and injury in virtually every community in America. Regardless of what agency provides medical transportation services, the fire service is the agency that first delivers on-scene health care services under most true emergency conditions. I’m sure you recall the recent media coverage of Yakima Firefighters arriving on scene and delivering two babies, PRIOR to the private ambulance arrival. In addition, the private ambulances routinely depend on Yakima Firefighters to perform patient care in the back of their ambulances-while en route to the hospital. This is yet another example of a public/private partnership where the tax payer benefits.
Take Care,
Charlie Hines
Fire Chief
cc: Dick Zais
Dave Zabell
Mayor Dave Edler
Council Members:
Maureen Adkinson
Micah Cawley
Kathy Coffey
Rick Ensey
Bill Lover
Sonia Rodriguez

City of Yakima EMS Levy Results and Fire Fighter / Paramedics Proposal

Monday, October 5th, 2009
To: Mayor Dave Edler
Councilmember Maureen Adkison
Councilmember Micah Cawley
Councilmember Kathy Coffey
Councilmember Rick Ensey
Councilmember Bill Lover
Councilmember Sonia Rodriguez
Subject: City of Yakima EMS Levy Results and Fire Fighter / Paramedics Proposal
Our March 24, 2009 letter from SOAR to the Yakima City Council asked several questions regarding !he EMS proposal. To date, the Council has not addressed or answered any of these questions. We also reminded the City Council of the EMS Levy vote results which were an overwhelming NO vote on this proposal. The idea of expanding the fire department services to include paramedics should be put to rest with another resounding NO vote. SOAR has continued consideration of this issue since it is still under consideration by the City Council and now has more questions including the following:
+ Where is the public support for this proposal?? Where is the citizens group or committee that would be advocating that paramedics be added to fire trucks? The only support for this idea is the fire chief and fire fighters union. Ask yourselves why the fire fighters union is pushing for paramedics on fire trucks?? Why does the firee department want to compete with private ambulance services?? Could the answer be to expand the fire fighters union and increase fire fighter salaries as paramedics while cloaking their proposal under the banner of public safety ??
+ Were the two existing fire fighters hired as firemen or as paramedics?? Do they receive additional compensation because of their advanced training which is not currently required for their jobs ??
+ The City and its citizens currently enjoy private ambulance services and a user pay system. That is, only persons needing EMS and transport services pay for these services. Why would we want to change to a publicly funded system ??
+ Our City currently has an EMS system that works. Unfortunately, our City government cannot afford to be everything to everybody. We have to use our limited resources in the most cost effective manner. Our current EMS with privately funded paramedics works and does not cost our taxpayers money unless they need and use the ambulance service. Why would we want to change ??
+ Why does the City Fire Department respond with large, expensive fire trucks to all 911 EMS calls?? It seems that huge fire trucks costing over $ 800,000 lumbering to an aid call is the absolute waste of a firefighting apparatus?? Why can’t the EMS dispatchers use discretion as to when large, expensive fire trucks are necessary ??
+ Is the City Fire Department responding to all 911 calls for EMS to simply increase their “call volume” to increase statistics and revenue from the Countywide EMS levy funds?? Can’t common sense and good judgement be used to determine when large, expensive fire trucks are sent on EMS calls ??
+ Fire Chief Hines stated publicly that a shortage of fire fighters has placed our citizens in danger. Would training of additional firee fighters as paramedics leave us with fewer fire fighters on duty or much increased overtime or additional cost for temporary fire fighters to fill these positions while others are being trained as paramedics?? The annual fire department overtime budget is already over $ 400,000. What would be the pay increase for fire fighters who are trained as paramedics?? What will be the future budget impacts of this program to add paramedics to fire trucks ??
+ How will the City fund training of additional fire fighters as paramedics if the City proceeds with paramedic/firee fighters?? How will the City fund the expensive equipment and medications necessary for paramedics on fire trucks ??
+ We believe that this current proposal to allow the two existing firefighters who are trained as paramedics to perform paramedic services is just the proverbial” nose of the camel in the tent”. If approved, we fully expect to see additional proposals from the Fire Chief in the near future to hire Dr train additional firefighters as paramedics, then purchase smaller emergency response vehicles with transport capabilities, and then ultimately to take over the ambulance services duties including transporting of patients to the hospitals, thereby putting the private ambulance companies out of business. This would be a poor direction for our City to go.
+ Perhaps the Yakima City Council should direct the firefighters duties, when not responding to fire calls, to improving the City’s safety and fire rating by being involved more with code enforcement, weedy lots, trashed up properties, derelict buildings, etc ??
Again, we respect our Yakima Fire Fighters and the job they are paid to perform. We believe the City Council should direct the Yakima Fire Department to focus on the vital fire fighting services and let the private ambulance services do their jobs. We look forward to answers to our questions from our City Council.
M.A. (Mel) Tanasse, President
Save Our American Rights (SOAR)

To: Mayor Dave Edler

Councilmember Maureen Adkison

Councilmember Micah Cawley

Councilmember Kathy Coffey

Councilmember Rick Ensey

Councilmember Bill Lover

Councilmember Sonia Rodriguez

Our March 24, 2009 letter from SOAR to the Yakima City Council asked several questions regarding the EMS proposal. To date, the Council has not addressed or answered any of these questions. We also reminded the City Council of the EMS Levy vote results which were an overwhelming NO vote on this proposal. The idea of expanding the fire department services to include paramedics should be put to rest with another resounding NO vote. SOAR has continued consideration of this issue since it is still under consideration by the City Council and now has more questions including the following:

+ Where is the public support for this proposal?? Where is the citizens group or committee that would be advocating that paramedics be added to fire trucks? The only support for this idea is the fire chief and fire fighters union. Ask yourselves why the fire fighters union is pushing for paramedics on fire trucks?? Why does the firee department want to compete with private ambulance services?? Could the answer be to expand the fire fighters union and increase fire fighter salaries as paramedics while cloaking their proposal under the banner of public safety ??

+ Were the two existing fire fighters hired as firemen or as paramedics?? Do they receive additional compensation because of their advanced training which is not currently required for their jobs ??

+ The City and its citizens currently enjoy private ambulance services and a user pay system. That is, only persons needing EMS and transport services pay for these services. Why would we want to change to a publicly funded system ??

+ Our City currently has an EMS system that works. Unfortunately, our City government cannot afford to be everything to everybody. We have to use our limited resources in the most cost effective manner. Our current EMS with privately funded paramedics works and does not cost our taxpayers money unless they need and use the ambulance service. Why would we want to change ??

+ Why does the City Fire Department respond with large, expensive fire trucks to all 911 EMS calls?? It seems that huge fire trucks costing over $ 800,000 lumbering to an aid call is the absolute waste of a firefighting apparatus?? Why can’t the EMS dispatchers use discretion as to when large, expensive fire trucks are necessary ??

+ Is the City Fire Department responding to all 911 calls for EMS to simply increase their “call volume” to increase statistics and revenue from the Countywide EMS levy funds?? Can’t common sense and good judgement be used to determine when large, expensive fire trucks are sent on EMS calls ??

+ Fire Chief Hines stated publicly that a shortage of fire fighters has placed our citizens in danger. Would training of additional firee fighters as paramedics leave us with fewer fire fighters on duty or much increased overtime or additional cost for temporary fire fighters to fill these positions while others are being trained as paramedics?? The annual fire department overtime budget is already over $ 400,000. What would be the pay increase for fire fighters who are trained as paramedics?? What will be the future budget impacts of this program to add paramedics to fire trucks ??

+ How will the City fund training of additional fire fighters as paramedics if the City proceeds with paramedic/firee fighters?? How will the City fund the expensive equipment and medications necessary for paramedics on fire trucks ??

+ We believe that this current proposal to allow the two existing firefighters who are trained as paramedics to perform paramedic services is just the proverbial” nose of the camel in the tent”. If approved, we fully expect to see additional proposals from the Fire Chief in the near future to hire Dr train additional firefighters as paramedics, then purchase smaller emergency response vehicles with transport capabilities, and then ultimately to take over the ambulance services duties including transporting of patients to the hospitals, thereby putting the private ambulance companies out of business. This would be a poor direction for our City to go.

+ Perhaps the Yakima City Council should direct the firefighters duties, when not responding to fire calls, to improving the City’s safety and fire rating by being involved more with code enforcement, weedy lots, trashed up properties, derelict buildings, etc ??

Again, we respect our Yakima Fire Fighters and the job they are paid to perform. We believe the City Council should direct the Yakima Fire Department to focus on the vital fire fighting services and let the private ambulance services do their jobs. We look forward to answers to our questions from our City Council.

M.A. (Mel) Tanasse, President

Save Our American Rights (SOAR)

Grade Separation – MLK Jr. & Lincoln Ave. Underpasses

Monday, October 5th, 2009

This document was read & given to Yakima City Council on 12-2-08

September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes
Yakima City Staff estimates the cost of the Grade separation aka
“Underpasses” for “MLK Jr.” St. & Lincoln Avenue at
$14,000,000.
March 19,2002 adjourned meeting minutes.
Mr. Wolcott from Berger ABAM Engineering reviewed the
problems caused by the BNSR rail traffic. Safety concerns at the
Railroad grade crossings have caused accidents and it was noted a
fatality occurred at the Mead avenue crossing which involved the
Central Railroad. In addition, the delay caused by the estimated 424
through trains per day was expected to impact Police and Fire
response time.
As it turns out there is a much greater safety factor existing when
you consider that the East bound traffic on Lincoln avenue is
choked down to a sharp right hand 90% turn on to Pierce avenue
heading South about %of a block then another sharp left hand 90%
turn to enter eastbound MLK Jr. This traffic transition is a hazard
and doesn’t speak well of engineering – photos taken Nov. 15t
2008.
Air pollution: The City was/is concerned about the air pollution
created by idling cars stopped for trains. It is my belief there is
more air pollution created by cars stopped for traffic lights on
MLK Jr. and Lincoln avenues. Cross traffic lights are triggered
immediately when one car approaches thus causing MLK Jr. &
Lincoln traffic to stop unnecessarily. This occurs early in the
morning between 5 am and 6:30 am.
September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes.
Traffic: The City has calculated the average vehicle delay at 9
minutes per crossing. By 2030 the estimated delay at rail crossings
would be 11 minutes per train to clear.
2008 Facts:
3 BNSF through-trains heading south were timed to determine the
traffic delay at the Yakima R/R crossings and the results were train
#1 = 3 minutes 3 seconds to clear; train #2 = 4 minutes 3 seconds
to clear and Train #3 = 4 minutes to clear.
September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes.
City statistics showed through trains totaled 4 to 6 per day with a
potential capacity of 12 to 14 per day. The City argues that
enlarging the Stampede Pass tunnel and other line improvements
could increase trains per day through Yakima to 20 – 26. Mr.
Walcott claims to have documents supporting the increased train
capacity.
2008 Facts:
BNSF has no immediate plans to invest in Washington. There is
no longer a bottleneck in the Stevens Pass Tunnel. There’s has
been a phenomenal increase in productivity, including the
expansion to 10,000 foot trains through the Stevens Pass Tunnel
instead of 7,000 foot trains. See 6-27/7-3-2008 Puget Sound
Business Journal.
September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes.
Trains – Mr. Wolcott pointed out that the Railroad is a private
company and their business depends on competition as well as the
import/export of goods. It was noted the BNSF – SPS route
through the Columbia River Gorge was at their capacity, leaving
the Stampede pass route as the most likely to be expanded.
2008 Facts:
The Columbia River Gorge route of SPS will receive improved
connections where the North-South Rail line turns east to parallel
the Columbia River to the Vancouver Bypass when the $115
million project is completed. Further, executives for the West’s
two largest railroads are pouring money into Southern California
routes, whiles investing very little in the Northwest. Los Angeles
and Long Beach have the best prospects for import growth while
Puget Sound ports stalled at about a quarter of the Southern
California volume. See 6-27/ 7-3-2008 Puget Sound Business
Journal.
March 19,2002 adjourned meeting minutes.
Mr. Wolcott suggested “MLK Jr.” and Lincoln Ave. should be
Phase 1 of the grade separation “underpasses” project due to the
amount of traffic utilizing those streets. Estimates of probable
construction cost for Phase 1 were $24,963,339. By 2005
estimated costs for the same Phase 1 construction had risen to
$29,950,000 and $34,770,000 by the end of 2006.
Currently, the cost estimate for this project has increased to over
$42,000,000 with no end in sight. This figure does not included
the additional costs to purchase BNSF property west of the main
tracks and south of Lincoln Avenue which we guess will be
upwards of $750,000.
Fact: 8-19-2008 “Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce” Mexico
has opened bidding on a new $4 billion Seaport that will rival Los
Angeles and Long Beach which are the largest ports in America.
The Punta Colonet Project is located 150 miles south of the U.S.
border and a planned railroad would bring containers directly to
points across the mid-western U.S. and is anticipated to begin
operation in 2012 with a capacity to handle 2 million 20 foot
containers and could expand to several times more. Yes, these
freighters would be sailing from Asia with goods heading north.
Fact: 9-2-2008 “Los Angeles Times” Los Angeles, Long Beach,
Seattle and Tacoma imports are down 13% for first 7 months of
2008. Those that are in the know don’t believe a turnaround will
begin before the second quarter of 2009. Now, with financial
institutions and Wall Street in distress, it is anybody’s guess as to
what will occur.
Fact: 6-27-2008 “Puget Sound Business Journal” the Vancouver
Fraser Port authority will spend $2.5 Billion on a new offshore
terminal doubling their capacity to 5 million 20 foot containers. In
addition, expanding the terminal to handle 12 million 20 foot
containers. The newly opened Prince Rupert port has a goal of
handling containers from Asia bound for the Mid-West. British
Columbia ports were up 7% the first half of 2008, while Seattle
was down nearly 5°A>.
IT APPEARS, BASED ON THE ABOVE-STATED FACTS, THE
ESTIMATED TRAIN TRAFFIC STASTISTICS USED TO
START THIS PROJECT WERE INACCURATE. NOW THAT
CURRENT AND ESTIMIATED FUTURE TRAIN TRAFFIC
SHOWS THAT THE PREVIDUS TRAIN TRAFFIC
PROJECTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN REALIZED, THE WISE
MOVE WOULD BE, AT A MINIMUM, TO REDUCE THIS
“UNDERPASSES” PROJECT TO ONE (1) ONLY
UNDERPASS!!!!

September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes

Yakima City Staff estimates the cost of the Grade separation aka “Underpasses” for “MLK Jr.” St. & Lincoln Avenue at $14,000,000.

March 19,2002 adjourned meeting minutes.

Mr. Wolcott from Berger ABAM Engineering reviewed the problems caused by the BNSR rail traffic. Safety concerns at the Railroad grade crossings have caused accidents and it was noted a fatality occurred at the Mead avenue crossing which involved the Central Railroad. In addition, the delay caused by the estimated 4-24 through trains per day was expected to impact Police and Fire response time.

As it turns out there is a much greater safety factor existing when you consider that the East bound traffic on Lincoln avenue is choked down to a sharp right hand 90% turn on to Pierce avenue heading South about %of a block then another sharp left hand 90% turn to enter eastbound MLK Jr. This traffic transition is a hazard and doesn’t speak well of engineering – photos taken Nov. 15th

2008.

Air pollution: The City was/is concerned about the air pollution created by idling cars stopped for trains. It is my belief there is more air pollution created by cars stopped for traffic lights on MLK Jr. and Lincoln avenues. Cross traffic lights are triggered immediately when one car approaches thus causing MLK Jr. & Lincoln traffic to stop unnecessarily. This occurs early in the morning between 5 am and 6:30 am.

September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes.

Traffic: The City has calculated the average vehicle delay at 9 minutes per crossing. By 2030 the estimated delay at rail crossings would be 11 minutes per train to clear.

2008 Facts:

3 BNSF through-trains heading south were timed to determine the traffic delay at the Yakima R/R crossings and the results were train #1 = 3 minutes 3 seconds to clear; train #2 = 4 minutes 3 seconds to clear and Train #3 = 4 minutes to clear.

September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes.

City statistics showed through trains totaled 4 to 6 per day with a potential capacity of 12 to 14 per day. The City argues that enlarging the Stampede Pass tunnel and other line improvements could increase trains per day through Yakima to 20 – 26. Mr. Walcott claims to have documents supporting the increased train capacity.

2008 Facts:

BNSF has no immediate plans to invest in Washington. There is no longer a bottleneck in the Stevens Pass Tunnel. There’s has been a phenomenal increase in productivity, including the expansion to 10,000 foot trains through the Stevens Pass Tunnel instead of 7,000 foot trains. See 6-27/7-3-2008 Puget Sound Business Journal.

September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes.

Trains – Mr. Wolcott pointed out that the Railroad is a private company and their business depends on competition as well as the import/export of goods. It was noted the BNSF – SPS route through the Columbia River Gorge was at their capacity, leaving the Stampede pass route as the most likely to be expanded.

2008 Facts:

The Columbia River Gorge route of SPS will receive improved connections where the North-South Rail line turns east to parallel the Columbia River to the Vancouver Bypass when the $115 million project is completed. Further, executives for the West’s two largest railroads are pouring money into Southern California routes, whiles investing very little in the Northwest. Los Angeles and Long Beach have the best prospects for import growth while Puget Sound ports stalled at about a quarter of the Southern California volume. See 6-27/ 7-3-2008 Puget Sound Business Journal.

March 19,2002 adjourned meeting minutes.

Mr. Wolcott suggested “MLK Jr.” and Lincoln Ave. should be Phase 1 of the grade separation “underpasses” project due to the amount of traffic utilizing those streets. Estimates of probable construction cost for Phase 1 were $24,963,339. By 2005 estimated costs for the same Phase 1 construction had risen to $29,950,000 and $34,770,000 by the end of 2006.

Currently, the cost estimate for this project has increased to over $42,000,000 with no end in sight. This figure does not included the additional costs to purchase BNSF property west of the main tracks and south of Lincoln Avenue which we guess will be upwards of $750,000.

Fact: 8-19-2008 “Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce” Mexico has opened bidding on a new $4 billion Seaport that will rival Los Angeles and Long Beach which are the largest ports in America. The Punta Colonet Project is located 150 miles south of the U.S. border and a planned railroad would bring containers directly to points across the mid-western U.S. and is anticipated to begin operation in 2012 with a capacity to handle 2 million 20 foot containers and could expand to several times more. Yes, these freighters would be sailing from Asia with goods heading north.

Fact: 9-2-2008 “Los Angeles Times” Los Angeles, Long Beach, Seattle and Tacoma imports are down 13% for first 7 months of 2008. Those that are in the know don’t believe a turnaround will begin before the second quarter of 2009. Now, with financial institutions and Wall Street in distress, it is anybody’s guess as to what will occur.

Fact: 6-27-2008 “Puget Sound Business Journal” the Vancouver Fraser Port authority will spend $2.5 Billion on a new offshore terminal doubling their capacity to 5 million 20 foot containers. In addition, expanding the terminal to handle 12 million 20 foot containers. The newly opened Prince Rupert port has a goal of handling containers from Asia bound for the Mid-West. British Columbia ports were up 7% the first half of 2008, while Seattle was down nearly 5*A>.

IT APPEARS, BASED ON THE ABOVE-STATED FACTS, THE ESTIMATED TRAIN TRAFFIC STASTISTICS USED TO START THIS PROJECT WERE INACCURATE. NOW THAT CURRENT AND ESTIMIATED FUTURE TRAIN TRAFFIC SHOWS THAT THE PREVIDUS TRAIN TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN REALIZED, THE WISE MOVE WOULD BE, AT A MINIMUM, TO REDUCE THIS “UNDERPASSES” PROJECT TO ONE (1) ONLY UNDERPASS!!!!


HOME          OUR MISSION          MEDIA          BLOG          LINKS          CONTACT